From “Farber on Film – the Complete Film Writings of Manny Farber” edited by Robert Polito:

 

Ugly Spotting

 

Hollywood has spawned, since 1946, a series of ugly melodramas featuring a cruel esthetic, desperate craftsmanship, and a pessimistic outlook. These supertabloid, geeklike films (The Set-Up, Act of Violence, Asphalt Jungle, No Way Out) are revolutionary attempts at turning life inside out to find the specks of horrible oddity that make puzzling, faintly marred kaleidoscopes of a street, face, or gesture. Whatever the cause of these depressing films - the television menace, the loss of 24 million customers since the mid-1940's - it has pro­duced striking changes in film technique. Writers overpack dialogue with hackneyed bitterness, actors perfect a quietly neurotic style, while directors ­by flattening the screen, discarding framed and centered action, and looming the importance of actors-have made the movie come out and hit the audience with an almost personal savagery. The few recent films unmarked by the new technique seem naive and obsolete.

 

The new scripts are tortured by the "big" statement. All About Eve (story of the bright lights, dim wits, and dark schemes of Broadway) hardly gets inside theater because most of the movie is coming out of somebody's mouth. The actors are burdened with impossible dialogue abounding in clichés: "Wherever there's magic and make-believe and an audience - there's theater"; timely words: "We are the original displaced personalities"; and forced cleverness that turns each stock character into the echo of an eclectic writer. The new trick is to build character and plot with loaded dialogue, using hep talk that has dis­colored cheap fiction for years. In The Breaking Point, the environment is a "jun­gle," the hero a morose skipper "with only guts to peddle," who decides after a near fatal gun battle that "a man alone hasn't got a chance." His spouse comes through with, "You're more man than anyone I ever knew."

 

The stories, parading success-seekers through a jackpot of frustration, are unique in that they pick on outcasts with relentless cruelty that decimates the actor as much as the character. As a colored intern moves through the No Way Out blizzard of anti-Negro curses, everything about him is aggressively spiked so that a malignant force seems to be hacking at him. When the cruel estheti­cians really click on these sadistic epics, foreboding death lurks over every scene. Cameramen dismember the human body, accenting oddities like Dar­nell's toothpick legs or Pat Neal's sprawling mouth, to make them inanimate; faces are made up to suggest death masks, expanded to an unearthly size, spot­lighted in dark, unknown vacuums; metaphorical direction twists a chimp's burial (Sunset Boulevard) into an uncanny experience by finding a resemblance between monkey and owner. Under the guise of sympathy, these brutally effi­cient artists are sneaky torturers of the defeated or deranged character.

 

Directors like Wilder and Mankiewicz mechanically recreate the unhar­nessed energy and surprise of great silent films with an elegantly controlled use of the inexplicable. In the jitterbugging scene of Asphalt Jungle, Huston deli­cately undresses the minds of four characters and gauchely creates a sensuous, writhing screen, though his notion of jive is so odiously surrealistic it recalls Russian propaganda against the United States. The first glimpse of the faded star in Sunset, using Bonnard's suede touch on Charles Addams's portraiture (a witch surveying her real estate through shutters and dark spectacles) is light­ning characterization with a poetic tang. Brando, in The Men, commands a GI troop into battle like a slow, doped traffic cop wagging cars through an inter­section, but his affected pantomime electrifies the screen with the hallucina­tory terror of an early painting by di Chirico. Movies have seldom if ever been as subtle as these scenes, or as depressing in the use of outrageous elements to expedite ambiguous craftsmanship.

 

To understand the motives behind the highly charged, dissonant acting employed today, one has to go back to the time-wasting, passive performance of an early talkie. No matter how ingenious the actor - Harlow, Garbo, Lee Tracy - effectiveness and depth were dissipated by the uninterrupted perusal of a character geared to a definite "type" and acted with mannerisms that were always so rhythmically and harmoniously related that the effect was of watching a highly attenuated ballet. Directors today have docked the old notion of unremittingly consistent, riverlike performances, and present what amounts to a confusion of "bits," the actor seen only intermittently in garish touches that are highly charged with meaning and character, but not actually melted into one clear recognizable person. Darnell's honestly ugly characteri­zation of a depressed slattern is fed piecemeal into No Way Out, which moves her toward and away from malevolence, confuses her "color," and even con­founds her body. Her job - like the recent ones of Nancy Olson, John MacIn­tyre, Hayden - shouldn't be called a "performance," because it is more like a collage of personality, which varies drastically in every way to create the great­est explosion and "illumination" in each moment.

 

October 28, 1950